Laurentian must hand over most privileged documents, court rules
With the exception of documents sealed under a court order, Laurentian University will have to hand over privileged information to the Ontario legislature.
Ontario's Superior Court of Justice issued the ruling Jan. 26 on the court fight between the insolvent university and Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk.
"I have concluded that, save and except for issues relating to the sealing order and the confidentiality order, the factum of the Speaker provides a complete answer to the arguments put forth by LU," Chief Justice Geoffrey B. Morawetz said in his ruling.
In December, the province's Standing Committee on Public Accounts approved a Speaker's warrant demanding Laurentian University hand over all documents requested by Auditor General Bonnie Lysyk. Lysyk is conducting a value-for-money audit to find out why LU declared insolvency.
The documents include information under a sealed order as part of the Companies' Creditors Arrangement Act (CCAA), under which Laurentian University's declared insolvency on Feb. 1, 2021.
Laurentian has resisted efforts by Lysyk to access confidential documents. An earlier court ruling said she doesn't have the power to demand the documents under existing provincial legislation.
The committee issued the warrant demanding the documents in early December using Parliamentary privilege, which gives the legislature the right to demand access to any document or witness it chooses.
Morawetz ruled that the authority of the elected assemblies goes beyond passing legislation and holding the government to account.
"This view of the legislative branch’s constitutional role entirely eschews the assembly’s deliberative role, as the 'grand inquest of the [province],' which the Supreme Court of Canada recognized as the third function of the legislative branch," he wrote.
"The assembly’s deliberative role encompasses more than simply debating legislative proposals from the government."
Elected assemblies in the province have traditionally had "the power to send for persons, papers and things,” Morawetz wrote.
"Parliament has the ability to institute its own inquiries, to require the attendance of witnesses, and to order production of documents that are fundamental to its proper functioning," he said in his ruling.
"These rights are as old as Parliament itself."
Once elected officials are in possession of confidential documents, it is their responsibility to ensure they are properly protected.
"Should the committee or the assembly give insufficient protections to these or other sensitive documents in its possession, it is for the electorate, not the courts, to pass judgment on their conduct," Morawetz wrote.
The committee has already promised to keep the documents confidential, he noted. And he rejected outright the argument that Parliamentary privilege does not extend to confidential documents.
"I agree with the Speaker that Parliamentary privilege extends to compelling production of information and documents that are subject to a class privilege from a non-governmental entity," Morawetz wrote.
"LU’s argument on this point does not raise a serious issue to be tried."
However, he said whether Parliamentary privilege extends to releasing documents sealed under a court order is a different matter.
"The question as to whether the legislative assembly can compel the production of such information or whether this goes beyond the scope of Parliamentary privilege is a serious issue that has not been addressed in any reported decision," Morawetz wrote.
"It is a fundamental question that affects the relationship between the three independent branches of government – the executive, the legislative and the judicial."
Morawetz wrote his job was to strike a balance between the two competing priorities. While accepting most of the Speaker's arguments, he ruled that there has not been a ruling on whether Parliament can access documents ordered sealed by a court.
"It is on this point that I find that I am unable to accept the position of the Speaker and the Attorney General," he wrote.
"I have not been provided with any authority that stands for the proposition that a pre-existing court order which restricts the disclosure of specified information can be overridden by a legislative assembly’s demand for production."
In this case, unsealing the documents would do significant harm to the parties involved in the CCAA process, Morawetz ruled.
"I have no hesitation in concluding that the disclosure of the information referenced in the sealing order and the mediation order is likely to result in irreparable harm to LU," he wrote in his decision.
"The consequences of disclosing the information that is restricted by the sealing order and the mediation orders are significant. The CCAA proceedings have been ongoing for a year and LU is in the process of developing its restructuring plan. Disclosure of the positions of affected parties at this stage, including that of LU, would be problematic."
But he said a hearing could be scheduled in February or March to hear arguments on that point.
"There will only be a relatively short delay in enforcement of the Speaker’s warrant pending determination of the scope of the privilege," he wrote.
"It is a serious issue which should be determined before it becomes a moot point."
Lysyk told CTV News Thursday afternoon that her office is still studying the decision to determine exactly what it means in terms of her accessing documents.
And in a news release, the Laurentian University Faculty Association said welcomes the decision, but "is disappointed about the exceptions currently granted to Laurentian regarding the mediation documents sealed under a court order."
“We believe that it is in the public interest and indeed of the entire Laurentian community that Laurentian University be transparent and accountable,” Fabrice Colin, president of LUFA, said in the release.
“We urge the administration to stop fighting against transparency.”
Laurentian University issued this statement Friday morning on the court decision:
"Laurentian University appreciates the clarity provided by the court’s decision on the preliminary issue of the stay of the Speaker’s warrants. The matters for which the stay was granted will be heard by the court on a date to be scheduled. With respect to those portions for which the stay does not apply, as Laurentian University has previously confirmed, it accepts the court’s guidance and will comply with all of its legal obligations, subject to any further direction of the court.
"The university will continue to cooperate with the Standing Committee’s request.
"Laurentian University is on a difficult and necessary journey of transformational change. As we continue the hard work of restructuring, we are working through a complex process involving many stakeholders with the assistance of a court-appointed monitor and under the direct supervision of the court. Especially in light of the province’s support, we remain confident that Laurentian will emerge as a fully restructured, financially viable, and renewed Laurentian University for the long-term."
And on Thursday, Laurentian was granted an extension to complete CCAA proceedings to May 31, The previous deadline was Jan. 31.
Read the full decisionon on privileged documents here.
Correction
An earlier version of this story incorrectly characterized the outcome of this case.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
BREAKING Speaker kicks Poilievre out of Commons over unparliamentary comments
Speaker Greg Fergus kicked Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre out of the House of Commons during question period today.
Man dies after suffering cardiac arrest while waiting in ER, widow wants investigation
When an ambulance took David Lippert to the hospital in March of 2023, the 68-year-old Kitchener, Ont., executive was hoping to find out why he was feeling weak and unable to walk. Some 24 hours later, he was found unresponsive in the ER.
Baby, grandparents among 4 people killed in wrong-way police chase on Ontario's Hwy. 401
A police chase which started with a liquor store robbery in Bowmanville Monday night ended in tragedy some 20 minutes later when a suspect fleeing police entered Highway 401 in the wrong direction and caused a pileup which killed an infant and the child's grandparents, as well as the suspect, investigators say.
Freeland previews omnibus budget bill, proposed capital gains tax change left out
Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Chrystia Freeland will be tabling yet another omnibus bill to pass a sweeping range of measures promised in her April 16 federal budget, though left out of the legislation is the government's proposed capital gains tax change.
Air Canada walks back new seat selection policy change after backlash
Air Canada has paused a new seat selection fee for travellers booked on the lowest fares just days after implementing it.
McGill requests 'police assistance' over pro-Palestinian encampment
McGill University says it has 'requested police assistance' about the pro-Palestinian encampment on its lower field.
Judge raises threat of jail in hush money trial as he holds Trump in contempt, fines him US$9,000
Donald Trump was held in contempt of court Tuesday and fined US$9,000 for repeatedly violating a gag order that barred him from making public statements about witnesses, jurors and some others connected to his New York hush money case. And if he does it again, the judge warned, he could be jailed.
Court upholds Milwaukee police officer's firing for posting racist memes after Sterling Brown arrest
The Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled Tuesday that a former Milwaukee police officer was properly fired for posting racist memes related to the arrest of an NBA player that triggered a public outcry.
Video captures deadly wrong-way police chase on Highway 401 in Ontario
A new video has surfaced showing a vehicle being pursued by police in the wrong direction on Highway 401 moments prior to a fatal crash that killed four people, including an infant and their grandparents.