Skip to main content

Sault councillors push for speed limit increase on Hwy. 17

Sault city council will debate a motion next week that would call on the province to increase the speed limit on Highway 17 from Sault Ste Marie to Thessalon. (File) Sault city council will debate a motion next week that would call on the province to increase the speed limit on Highway 17 from Sault Ste Marie to Thessalon. (File)
Share

Sault city council will debate a motion next week that would call on the province to increase the speed limit on Highway 17 from Sault Ste Marie to Thessalon.

The motion comes after the Ontario government raised the speed limit on nine sections of provincial highways, including Highway 69 in Sudbury.

The change, which took effect July 12, affects the section of highway from Sudbury to French River, a distance of about 60 kilometres. The speed limit there is now 110 km/h.

In the Sault, a motion oved by Coun. Stephan Kinach and seconded by Coun. Marchy Bruni calls on the province to do the same on Highway 17.

The motion says that “most of Ontario’s highways were originally designed to safely accommodate speed limits of 110km/hr.”

It also says new technology increases safety in vehicles and that other provinces (Alberta, Manitoba, New Brunswick, Nova Scotia and Saskatchewan) already have a maximum speed limit of 110km/h. In British Columbia, maximum limit is 120km/h, the motion said.

o    Download our app to get local alerts on your device

o    Get the latest local updates right to your inbox

And the motion says a provincial study concluded that “evidence-based speed increases are a common-sense change to make life more convenient for Ontario drivers while bringing our highway speed limit in line with other Canadian provinces.”

If approved, the motion would have Mayor Matthew Shoemaker write a letter to Transportation Minister Prabmeet Sarkaria asking him to consider “a maximum speed limit increase along the sections on two-lane divided highway from the current 90km/h.”

Sault council meeting Monday at 5 p.m. A copy of the full agenda can be found here.

CTVNews.ca Top Stories

A man who has brain damage has a murder conviction reversed after a 34-year fight

A man who has brain damage and was sentenced to life in prison for the murder of a shopkeeper in London had his decades-old conviction quashed Wednesday by an appeals court troubled by the possibility police elicited a false confession from a mentally vulnerable man. Oliver Campbell, who suffered cognitive impairment as a baby and struggles with his concentration and memory, was 21 when he was jailed in 1991 after being convicted based partly on admissions his lawyer said were coerced. “The fight for justice is finally over after nearly 34 years," Campbell said. “I can start my life an innocent man.” Campbell, now in his 50s, was convicted of the robbery and murder of Baldev Hoondle, who was shot in the head in his shop in the Hackney area of east London in July 1990. He had a previous appeal rejected in 1994 and was released from prison in 2002 on conditions that could have returned him to prison if he got into trouble. Defense lawyer Michael Birnbaum said police lied to Campbell and “badgered and bullied” him into giving a false confession by admitting he pulled the trigger in an accident. He was interviewed more than a dozen times, including sessions without either a lawyer or other adult present. His learning disability put him “out of his depth” and he was "simply unable to do justice to himself,” Birnbaum said. He said the admissions were nonsense riddled with inconsistencies that contradicted facts in the case. At trial, he testified that he was not involved in the robbery and had been somewhere else though he couldn't remember where. A co-defendant, Eric Samuels, who has since died, pleaded guilty to the robbery and was sentenced to five years in prison. At the time, he told his lawyer Campbell was not the gunman and later told others Campbell wasn’t with him during the robbery. Lawyers continued to advocate for Campbell that he wasn't the killer and his case was referred to the Court of Appeal by the Criminal Cases Review Commission which investigates potential injustices. The three judges on the Court of Appeal rejected most of Birnbaum's grounds for appeal but said they were troubled by the conviction in light of a new understanding of the reliability of admissions from someone with a mental disability. The panel quashed the conviction as 'unsafe,' and refused to order a retrial.

Stay Connected