Judge rejects charter violation claim, Sault man to be retried on impaired driving charge
A higher court has struck down a decision by a lower court that acquitted a Sault Ste. Marie man on an impaired driving charge.
The lawyer for the man had successfully argued that his client's charter rights were breached because of delays in administering a breath test that confirmed he had been drinking.
The case stems from a September 2019 incident in the Sault when police responded to a call about a pickup truck in a ditch on Allen Side Road, north of Third Line West.
People at the scene identified the driver, who was sitting on the shoulder of the road.
When the suspect approached police, an officer "was able to smell the odour of an alcoholic beverage on the respondent’s breath," said the court transcript of the appeal.
"At approximately 11:40 p.m., (police) formed the reasonable suspicion that the respondent had alcohol in his body while he had been the operating the motor vehicle, which was beside him in the ditch."
Emergency medical crews arrived, and police waited while the man was assessed by EMS staff.
"The officer overheard the respondent admit to consuming alcohol as opposed to drugs, which reaffirmed his reasonable suspicion that alcohol was in the person’s body," the transcript said.
"The respondent also told EMS that he was wearing his seatbelt, the airbag deployed and that he attempted to swerve to avoid hitting a deer."
After he was assessed – around 11:57 p.m. -- police told him they suspected he had been drinking and administered a breath test. He failed the test and was arrested for impaired driving.
At trial, the defence argued the man's charter rights were violated because the officer delayed administering the test while he was assessed by EMS. The law states the breath test must be administered "forthwith" after police develop reasonable grounds the suspect had been drinking.
Instead, the defence argued police had "detained" him without administering the test.
"The s. 10(a) charter right was infringed because during the first 17 minutes of the respondent's detention, he was not informed promptly of the reason," the defence argued.
"The s. 10(b) charter right was infringed because during the first 17 minutes of the respondent's arbitrary detention, he was also not offered the right to retain and instruct counsel without delay nor was he even informed of the right to be able to do so."
The police officer was "ignorant" of the meaning of the "forthwith" requirement, which led to a number of charter violations, the trial judge ruled, and dismissed the case.
The Crown appealed that decision, and the Ontario Superior Court of Justice agreed. The trial judge erred in ruling the man had been detained beginning at 11:40, when police first suspected he had been drinking, and therefore the breath test should have been administered right away.
Instead, the officer was at an accident scene, the court ruled, and was allowing the suspect to be assessed by medical staff.
'Fatal' error
"The officer had experienced accident scenes in which an involved party appeared to be medically sound only to take a turn," the transcript said. "This was a contextual element that should have formed part of the analysis."
The court ruled the fact police developed the suspicion he had been drinking doesn't automatically mean the man's detention began at that moment.
"There are circumstances where a person may not yet be detained when reasonable suspicion is formed," the court ruled.
"While the officer testified that he wished for the respondent to be examined by EMS, there is no evidence that he controlled or forced the respondent to avail himself of a medical examination by EMS or even communicated with the respondent about it."
In this context, the court ruled the trial judge made a "fatal" error in assuming the man's detention automatically began when police developed the suspicion he had been drinking.
The trial judge should have analyzed whether the man was actually being detained by police while EMS examined him – and there is good evidence he was not.
"There is a reasonable degree of certainty that the acquittal at trial was materially affected by the error outlined above," the transcript said.
"The appeal is allowed. The acquittal is set aside. A new trial is hereby ordered."
Read the full transcript here.
CTVNews.ca Top Stories
Sophie Gregoire Trudeau on navigating post-political life, co-parenting and freedom
Sophie Gregoire Trudeau says there is 'still so much love' between her and Prime Minister Justin Trudeau, as they navigate their post-separation relationship co-parenting their three children.
What to know about avian influenza in dairy cows and the risk to humans
Why is H5N1, or bird flu, a concern, how does it spread, and is there a vaccine? Here are the answers to some frequently asked questions about avian influenza.
'I was scared': Ontario man's car repossessed after missing two repair loan payments
An Ontario man who took out a loan to pay for auto repairs said his car was repossessed after he missed two payments.
opinion The special relationship between King Charles and the Princess of Wales
Royal commentator Afua Hagan writes that when King Charles recently admitted Catherine to the Order of the Companions of Honour, it not only made history, but it reinforced the strong bond between the King and his beloved daughter-in-law.
Pro-plastic lobbyist presence at UN talks is 'troubling,' say advocates
Environmentalist groups are sounding the alarm about a steep increase in the number of pro-plastic lobbyists at the UN pollution talks taking place this week.
'Too young to have breast cancer': Rates among young Canadian women rising
Breast cancer rates are rising in Canada among women in their 20s, 30s and 40s, according to research by the University of Ottawa (uOttawa).
Charlie Woods, son of Tiger, shoots 81 in U.S. Open qualifier
Charlie Woods failed to advance in a U.S. Open local qualifying event Thursday, shooting a 9-over 81 at Legacy Golf & Tennis Club.
$70M Lotto Max winners kept prize a secret from family for 2 months
During a special winner celebration near their hometown, Doug and Enid shared the story of how they discovered they were holding a Lotto Max ticket worth $70 million and how they kept this huge secret for so long.
Trump's lawyers grill ex-tabloid publisher as 1st week of hush money trial testimony nears a close
After prosecutors' lead witness painted a tawdry portrait of “catch-and-kill” tabloid schemes, defence lawyers in Donald Trump's criminal trial on Friday sought to dig into an account of the former publisher of the National Enquirer and his efforts to protect Trump from negative stories during the 2016 election.